Privacy Ref Blog

CNIL’s Google Fine of 50 million Euros

The announcement from CNIL about their decision to fine Google provide a valuable insight into the thinking of Supervisory Authorities when it comes to transparency (notice) and consent.

Google’s vulnerability to fine is attributed to the complexity of their privacy notice and terms of service. The information a user may wish to find was scattered over several web pages, in different documents, making it difficult for a consumer. Further, CNIL cited that the information was sometimes vague and non-specific again leaving the user uninformed.

The consent issue is related in that a user can not give valid consent under GDPR if the controller is not being transparent about their practices. Further, Google was using one opt-in to accept all aspects of processing under the privacy notice (and terms & conditions) instead of obtaining specific consent across their different platforms (search, YouTube, etc.), Finally, when Google did give an opportunity to the user to tailor their permissions, they used an opt-out instead of obtaining affirmative consent to provide advertising services.

It is also interesting that, while Google’s EU headquarters is Ireland and their lead SA is the Irish Data Protection Authority, it was decided that at least a portion of their business was not subject to the one-stop-shopping provisions of GDPR. The mobile side of Google’s business, the Android operating system, was found to be controlled by Google LLC in the US.

Privacy Ref is recommending to our clients that do business in the EU to review their privacy notice and consent practices with this CNIL decision in mind. For more information or assistance, please feel free to contact our team.

  • author's avatar

    By: Bob Siegel

    Bob Siegel, the founder and President of Privacy Ref, Inc., has extensive professional experience in the development and improvement of privacy policies and procedures, the definition of performance metrics to evaluate privacy maturity, and the evaluation of compliance. He utilizes a combination of alignment, adaptability, and accountability strategies to guide organizations in achieving their privacy goals. He is a Fellow of Information Privacy (FIP) and a Certified Information Privacy Professional, awarded from the International Association of Privacy Professionals, with concentrations in U.S. private-sector law (CIPP/US), US public sector law (CIPP/G), European law (CIPP/E), and Canadian law (CIPP/C). He is also a Certified Information Privacy Manager (CIPM) and Privacy Technologist (CIPT). Siegel is a member of the IAPP faculty, has served on the Certification Advisory Board for the CIPM program the Publications Advisory Board. Siegel also writes the blog “Operational Privacy” on CSOonline.com

  • author's avatar


  • author's avatar

    CCPA is a Shiny Object
    What you don’t know may (pleasantly) surprise you
    In praise of a privacy compliance program
    Looking to 2019 Privacy Plans
    Preparing your customer-facing staff

    See all this author’s posts

Privacy Ref provides consulting and assessment services to build and improve organizational privacy programs. For more information call Privacy Ref at (888) 470-1528 or email us at info@privacyref.com

Posted on March 12, 2019 by Bob Siegel


« »

No Responses

Comments are closed.


« »

Subscribe to our mailing list

Please fill out the form below.

Required

Want to find out more?

Simply go to the contact page, fill out the form, and someone from Privacy Ref will be in touch with you. You can also send an email to info@privacyref.com or call (888) 470-1528.

News

May 31, 2019

We are now offering Privacy Professional Training from the IAPP at our Houston and Nashua offices in addition our Delray Beach location.

Latest Blog Posts

June 13, 2019

Fifty States, Fifty Laws


The big news lately is that individual states are proposing their own privacy laws. California has the California Consumer Protection Act and now New York and Maine have also proposed laws. There has been discussion of a federal law, however it seems unlikely that any kind of landmark legislation on privacy passes through to be signed. How is a business to be ready for up to 50 different laws?

Continue reading this post...

June 12, 2019

Privacy Comes at a Price
At Apple’s World Wide Developers Conference last week, the message was all about Privacy. Apple has been more privacy-minded than other tech companies – that’s not news and it’s why I have an iPhone. They’ve introduced some interesting privacy features, such as showing location tracking, which I think is pretty cool. I don’t leave my location setting on, rather turn it on when I need directions and then back off. It’s tedious, but I’m not confident that when I’ve turned off location services, apps aren’t tracking me even though I said “no”. Sadly, I don’t think no means no on the Internet. So, I’ll be able to see if I’m right or wrong. Continue reading this post...

Other Recent Posts

PRIVACY REF