Growing up I spent a good amount of time at Radio Shack. I liked to “play” with electronics just to understand how things worked. It always bothered me that they asked for my zip code for every transaction, but they still got my money. That may be in part why I became a privacy professional.
I continued to visit the chain in recent years, mostly for batteries and replacement parts. How was I to know that, in spite of their privacy notice, Radio Shack would eventually try to sell my personal information during their bankruptcy.
Radio Shack’s online privacy notice
Within their on-line privacy notice, which only applies to RadioShack.com, there is a section discussing information sharing and disclosure.Almost all privacy notices have a similar section describing when and why personal information may be disclosed. (Note: I was too late to visit the local store to see the posted version.)
Radio Shack’s privacy notice states in the sharing and disclosure section:
Information about you specifically will not be used for any purpose other than to carry out the services you requested from RadioShack and its affiliates. All of our affiliates have agreed to maintain the security and confidentiality of the information we provide to them.
We will not sell or rent your personally identifiable information to anyone at any time.
We will not use any personal information beyond what is necessary to assist us in delivering to you the services you have requested.
We may send personally identifiable information about you to other organizations when:
We have your consent to share the information (you will be provided the opportunity to opt-out if you desire). For example, if you opt-in for emails we will share this information with our marketing provider.
We need to share your information in order to provide the product or service you have requested. For example, we need to share information with credit card providers and shippers to bill and ship the product you requested.
We are required to do so by law, for example, in response to a court order or subpoena.
As a privacy professional I feel pretty good about doing business with a company with a notice and, hopefully, an associated internal policy that severely limits the sharing of my personal information. I leave to Attorneys General and regulators to decide if the selling of customer personal information in this case is actionable (but I would suggest it may be).
What is the privacy notice missing
We can never predict what will happen during the transition of a company during bankruptcy or acquisition. Customer lists and the associated personal information is an asset. There is a good chance that during a transition a company will want to derive some value from this data.
Adding a single bullet point to the privacy notice could easily address personal information sales during a transition. For example the following statement comes from the Staples.com privacy notice:
We may disclose Personal Information to third parties in connection with a merger, acquisition or sale (including any transfers made as part of insolvency or bankruptcy proceedings) involving Staples or its affiliated companies or as part of a corporate reorganization, stock or asset sale, or other change in corporate control.
The privacy team at a company needs to think ahead and leave the company options for the processing of personal information that management running the day-to-day business operations may not consider. Addressing the transfer of personal information if, and when, a transition occurs is just one of these situations.
Bob Siegel, the founder and President of Privacy Ref, Inc., has extensive professional experience in the development and improvement of privacy policies and procedures, the definition of performance metrics to evaluate privacy maturity, and the evaluation of compliance. He utilizes a combination of alignment, adaptability, and accountability strategies to guide organizations in achieving their privacy goals.
He is a Fellow of Information Privacy (FIP) and a Certified Information Privacy Professional, awarded from the International Association of Privacy Professionals, with concentrations in U.S. private-sector law (CIPP/US), US public sector law (CIPP/G), European law (CIPP/E), and Canadian law (CIPP/C). He is also a Certified Information Privacy Manager (CIPM) and Privacy Technologist (CIPT).
Siegel is a member of the IAPP faculty, has served on the Certification Advisory Board for the CIPM program the Publications Advisory Board.
Siegel also writes the blog “Operational Privacy” on CSOonline.com
Simply go to the contact page, fill out the form, and someone from Privacy Ref will be in touch with you. You can also send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org or call (888) 470-1528.
April 16, 2018
IAPP Training Classes
Privacy Ref is proud to announce that we are an official training partner of the IAPP. You now have the opportunity to learn from one of our knowledgeable privacy professionals using the most respected training content in the industry. The robust interactive training offered, aids in the understanding of critical privacy concepts. The contents of the courses are integral to obtaining your privacy certifications and to educate your new team. Learn more here.
My path towards a career in the privacy field was a circuitous route. As a perennially engaged Political Organizer and activist, information privacy and data management would not have been the most obvious path for my next endeavor. However, after serving on a campaign that featured the most famous political data breach in history, privacy and the importance of data management came crashing into my life.
Continue reading this post...
A few weeks ago, I made it to Austin, TX for the Privacy Security and Risk Conference being held by the IAPP. As always, it was a great conference with pros and those who have only just begun as privacy professionals. One of the most interesting aspects of the conference was the focus on the newest US based privacy regulation, the California Consumer Protection Act. While not being in California, it was obviously the center of the conversation as many eyed this upcoming regulation as the next possible GDPR.
Continue reading this post...