Privacy Ref Blog

My first wearable technology adventures

Over the past few weeks I have started to wear my Google Glass in public. The experiences have been invaluable to my understanding of the privacy implications of wearable technology. My evolving perspective on wearable technology has been somewhat unexpected.

My personal privacy policy for wearable technology

In a previous post I discussed my need to create a personal privacy policy for my use of wearable technology. I settled on a few points:

  1. Be transparent that wearable technology is being used.
  2. Provide verbal notice to those I am meeting with by explaining what I am wearing and how I intend to use it before they ask.
  3. Respect requests for information from anyone that approaches me.
  4. Respect privacy requests from individuals or businesses up to and including deleting any images or videos already taken (the “right to be forgotten”).

Now that I had my policy in place it was time to go out in public.

Taking Glass to dinner

My wife and I were meeting some friends for dinner and Glass was coming along. Our friends are not shy, when we met to go to the restaurant they immediately asked what I was wearing. I explained Glass, gave a quick demo, and off we went to a local restaurant.2_Georges

Upon reaching our destination a small group of 20-somethings came up and asked about Glass. They had heard about Glass, but had never seen it. Most other people we passed looked and / or stared, but respected our privacy.

After ordering our meals we began discussing another restaurant we had heard of but didn’t know much about. Using Glass, I searched for information allowing me to talk reasonably intelligently about the place. My friends thought this was weird. It was interesting that they were more uncomfortable with me being able to retrieve information without reaching for a smartphone than they were with the potential of having their picture published on a social network.

I’ve taken Glass to other restaurants, some stores, and just for walks around the neighborhood. The reactions are  pretty much the same: tech-savvy people ask about the technology, others just look, maybe stare a bit, and move on.

It’s all about the glassware

I have begun to add glassware (or apps) which have gotten me hooked on Glass. It is not hard to see how this technology can be useful in both my business and personal life.

Letting my imagination run free, there is potential for some very interesting consumer and business applications using wearable technology as a platform. Ultimately, just like a smartphone, each user of Glass will have a unique set of capabilities based on the glassware they install.

Thinking of Glass as just a new user interface

My evolving perspective is based upon thinking of Glass as a new user interface to an existing technology, an enhancement to my smartphone if you will. Like any new enhancement we need to figure out the acceptable etiquette associated with Glass or any other wearable technology.

Establishing the correct etiquette for wearable technology is no different than when mobile phones became ubiquitous, followed by cameras in phones and then smartphones themselves. (Frankly I am not sure we have that etiquette worked out yet.)

For example when I was first using Glass I was constantly looking up and to the right to view the screen. It was very distracting until I got used to the display being there. During conversation people thought I might be checked out and playing with my new, shiny object (I am a guy after all), similar to my following soccer match scores from my brand new smartphone years ago. The etiquette lesson here, sometimes just give it a rest.

Wearable technology and privacy

My perspective continues to evolve, but I am less concerned about privacy related to Glass than I was before I started using the product. I am beginning to view the basic privacy challenges as similar to those associated with existing mobile technology. For Glass, the privacy risks are basically the same as with any Android-based technology.

A simple example of the parallelism can be seen if you consider taking a picture with wearable technology or your smartphone. In both cases an image is being taken of a person with or without their knowledge and consent. In both cases the onus lies with the app/glassware developers and users to decide what is collected, what is shared, how it is shared, and who else receives any information collected.

As I continue to use Glass I am sure my perspective will continue to evolve. There are a number of privacy considerations (and I suggest responsibilities) that a business or individual has as they consider deploying wearable technology. More on this in future posts.

  • author's avatar

    By: Bob Siegel

    Bob Siegel, the founder and President of Privacy Ref, Inc., has extensive professional experience in the development and improvement of privacy policies and procedures, the definition of performance metrics to evaluate privacy maturity, and the evaluation of compliance. He utilizes a combination of alignment, adaptability, and accountability strategies to guide organizations in achieving their privacy goals.

    He is a Fellow of Information Privacy (FIP) and a Certified Information Privacy Professional, awarded from the International Association of Privacy Professionals, with concentrations in U.S. private-sector law (CIPP/US), US public sector law (CIPP/G), European law (CIPP/E), and Canadian law (CIPP/C). He is also a Certified Information Privacy Manager (CIPM) and Privacy Technologist (CIPT).

    Siegel is a member of the IAPP faculty, has served on the Certification Advisory Board for the CIPM program the Publications Advisory Board.

    Siegel also writes the blog “Operational Privacy” on CSOonline.com

  • author's avatar

  • author's avatar

    In praise of a privacy compliance program
    Looking to 2019 Privacy Plans
    Preparing your customer-facing staff
    Automation for Privacy
    Don’t Forget Basic Communication

    See all this author’s posts

Privacy Ref provides consulting and assessment services to build and improve organizational privacy programs. For more information call Privacy Ref at (888) 470-1528 or email us at info@privacyref.com

Posted on January 5, 2014 by Bob Siegel
Tags: , , ,

« »

No Responses

Comments are closed.


« »

Subscribe to our mailing list

Please fill out the form below.

Required

Want to find out more?

Simply go to the contact page, fill out the form, and someone from Privacy Ref will be in touch with you. You can also send an email to info@privacyref.com or call (888) 470-1528.

News

April 16, 2018

IAPP Training Classes
Privacy Ref is proud to announce that we are an official training partner of the IAPP. You now have the opportunity to learn from one of our knowledgeable privacy professionals using the most respected training content in the industry. The robust interactive training offered, aids in the understanding of critical privacy concepts. The contents of the courses are integral to obtaining your privacy certifications and to educate your new team. Learn more here.

Latest Blog Posts

February 1, 2019

In praise of a privacy compliance program

Opening my newsfeed this morning I was not surprised to find an article about another data breach. Over the coming days I am sure we will discover that the organization's policies were well defined, that training and awareness had taken place, and it was just that the procedures weren't followed by one individual. The skeptic in me would say that if one person isn't following procedures, there are probably others. To prevent situations like these, an organization must establish a privacy compliance regimen. Continue reading this post...

December 19, 2018

Political Campaigns Need Privacy Policies and Training
When I made the transition from working in American Politics to learning about Privacy, the first tidbit of information I was given was that there was a difference in terminology between the American  and the European practice. In America, we use the term Privacy but in Europe they use the term Data Protection. As I continued my journey in “Privacy” and I considered how my new-found training would have impacted my career in politics, I have come to feel that the term data protection is more applicable to the needs of political campaigns. If I were to review the numerous political campaigns that I have managed, marketed, and organized, data protection has always been woefully inadequate throughout them all. Continue reading this post...

Other Recent Posts

PRIVACY REF