Privacy Ref Blog

A Privacy Pro and Wearable Technology

Privacy professionals, including myself, have been warning of the dangers to privacy from wearable technology. The concerns I have been expressing have been based on reported product capabilities, anecdotal evidence, and published reports. So when I had the opportunity to join the Google Glass Explorer program, I jumped at the chance.

Getting Glass

I received by Glass about a week ago. Like a child receiving a new present I tore open the packaging to see the shiny new object inside. Following the instructions, I set up a Google+ account, downloaded an app to my smartphone, and charged the Glass. I was now ready to go, deferring setting the privacy settings on Google+ until later.

Without adding any glassware (apps), I began to try the thing out; I sent a text message to my wife. I made a phone call; I took a picture and shared it; and I took a very short video.

An unexpected creepiness factor

The next day I thought I was ready to take Glass out in public. Bright and early in the morning I put on Glass, leashed up the dog, and, as we stepped out the door, it happened…the  creepy feeling.

Whether I did it or not, I might be about to be perceived as invading my neighbors privacy. People I don’t know may think I am taking their picture or shooting a video that they think I will share with the world.

More importantly, will I be tempted to take those pictures and videos without asking permission? After all, to take a picture I just have to wink with my right eye (speaking of creepy,will the women think I am flirting?) and aside from a 2 or 3 second light in the screen that is easy to miss, no one will know I took the picture. I had come to he start of an ethical crossroad.

Privacy in public

Off my dog and I went, immediately meeting one of my neighbors, Arnie. Arnie was looking at me a little strangely as we talked but he didn’t ask about the Glass. This is one of the common reactions I get when people notice that I am wearing something “different”.

People who don’t know about the technology try to casually ignore what you are wearing. Arnie thought is was an aid for sight in my right eye. By not asking about Glass he was respecting my privacy. He thought if I wanted to share my maladies with him I would, otherwise it was none of his business.

My discomfort rose. How could I take anyone’s picture without their knowledge when they were respecting my privacy?

My dog and I returned home.

A personal privacy policy and notice

I decided I need to practice what I preach. I need to define my personal privacy policy for the use of Glass. What notice would I give? How would I give it? Would I want to obtain consent?  (I’d be interested in your comments.)

Over the coming weeks I will be using Glass in various social and professional situations. I am interested in how wearable technology will integrate into my life and how people will respond.

I am interested in how businesses will respond. Will security stop me from entering a store or an office building? Will I be asked to take them off Glass during a meeting?

How will other privacy professionals at the IAPP Summit react?

For now, if you see me coming just think of me as Alan Funt for 2014. “Smile, your on Candid Camera”.



  • author's avatar

    By: Bob Siegel

    Bob Siegel, the founder and President of Privacy Ref, Inc., has extensive professional experience in the development and improvement of privacy policies and procedures, the definition of performance metrics to evaluate privacy maturity, and the evaluation of compliance. He utilizes a combination of alignment, adaptability, and accountability strategies to guide organizations in achieving their privacy goals.

    He is a Fellow of Information Privacy (FIP) and a Certified Information Privacy Professional, awarded from the International Association of Privacy Professionals, with concentrations in U.S. private-sector law (CIPP/US), US public sector law (CIPP/G), European law (CIPP/E), and Canadian law (CIPP/C). He is also a Certified Information Privacy Manager (CIPM) and Privacy Technologist (CIPT).

    Siegel is a member of the IAPP faculty, has served on the Certification Advisory Board for the CIPM program the Publications Advisory Board.

    Siegel also writes the blog “Operational Privacy” on

  • author's avatar

  • author's avatar

    In praise of a privacy compliance program
    Looking to 2019 Privacy Plans
    Preparing your customer-facing staff
    Automation for Privacy
    Don’t Forget Basic Communication

    See all this author’s posts

Privacy Ref provides consulting and assessment services to build and improve organizational privacy programs. For more information call Privacy Ref at (888) 470-1528 or email us at

Posted on December 22, 2013 by Bob Siegel
Tags: , , , , ,

« »

No Responses

Comments are closed.

« »

Subscribe to our mailing list

Please fill out the form below.


Want to find out more?

Simply go to the contact page, fill out the form, and someone from Privacy Ref will be in touch with you. You can also send an email to or call (888) 470-1528.


April 16, 2018

IAPP Training Classes
Privacy Ref is proud to announce that we are an official training partner of the IAPP. You now have the opportunity to learn from one of our knowledgeable privacy professionals using the most respected training content in the industry. The robust interactive training offered, aids in the understanding of critical privacy concepts. The contents of the courses are integral to obtaining your privacy certifications and to educate your new team. Learn more here.

Latest Blog Posts

February 1, 2019

In praise of a privacy compliance program

Opening my newsfeed this morning I was not surprised to find an article about another data breach. Over the coming days I am sure we will discover that the organization's policies were well defined, that training and awareness had taken place, and it was just that the procedures weren't followed by one individual. The skeptic in me would say that if one person isn't following procedures, there are probably others. To prevent situations like these, an organization must establish a privacy compliance regimen. Continue reading this post...

December 19, 2018

Political Campaigns Need Privacy Policies and Training
When I made the transition from working in American Politics to learning about Privacy, the first tidbit of information I was given was that there was a difference in terminology between the American  and the European practice. In America, we use the term Privacy but in Europe they use the term Data Protection. As I continued my journey in “Privacy” and I considered how my new-found training would have impacted my career in politics, I have come to feel that the term data protection is more applicable to the needs of political campaigns. If I were to review the numerous political campaigns that I have managed, marketed, and organized, data protection has always been woefully inadequate throughout them all. Continue reading this post...

Other Recent Posts