Privacy Ref Blog

Valuable functionality can cause a privacy breach

Last Friday it was revealed that reporters from Bloomberg News could retrieve information from the profiles of subscribers to Bloomberg’s data terminals as well as the subscribers’ system usage (NYT article here). While I agree with the characterization of this incident as a “mistake”, wasn’t this really a violation of basic privacy principles?

The ability to see user profiles and their system usage is a valuable feature that can be used by administrators or help desk staff. However, this is the type of functionality that should be restricted to those who have a need to know.

No matter which data privacy framework you prefer, there is a tenet that states that personal information should be used for the purpose specified at the time of collection (or in the privacy notice). A corollary to this would be that any additional use would require an additional disclosure to the data subject. In the Bloomberg case these maxims were just not followed. Implementing a role-based authorization scheme would have allowed the retention of the functionality while protecting subscriber privacy.

One needs to ask if, at the time of development, privacy requirements were included in the specifications for the application. If not, it was clearly a mistake. Alternatively, it would not be unusual for the capabilities of the application to grow over time resulting in the potential for undisclosed access. If so, one needs to ask if privacy requirements were considered as new functionality was developed. In either situation the principles of Privacy by Design could have been leveraged to avoid the privacy breach.

It is a fair assumption that the functionality was not a secret within the Bloomberg News organization. An additional concern then is that either no one thought enough of the potential privacy implications to report the privacy risk or no one recognized that a privacy risk existed. This underscores the need for a clear internal privacy policy with supporting training and awareness programs.

By considering privacy requirements up front and establishing an effective privacy training and awareness program, the brand damage, public relations, and relate operational costs of addressing situations such as this can be avoided.

  • author's avatar

    By: Bob Siegel

    Bob Siegel, the founder and President of Privacy Ref, Inc., has extensive professional experience in the development and improvement of privacy policies and procedures, the definition of performance metrics to evaluate privacy maturity, and the evaluation of compliance. He utilizes a combination of alignment, adaptability, and accountability strategies to guide organizations in achieving their privacy goals.

    He is a Fellow of Information Privacy (FIP) and a Certified Information Privacy Professional, awarded from the International Association of Privacy Professionals, with concentrations in U.S. private-sector law (CIPP/US), US public sector law (CIPP/G), European law (CIPP/E), and Canadian law (CIPP/C). He is also a Certified Information Privacy Manager (CIPM) and Privacy Technologist (CIPT).

    Siegel is a member of the IAPP faculty, has served on the Certification Advisory Board for the CIPM program the Publications Advisory Board.

    Siegel also writes the blog “Operational Privacy” on CSOonline.com

  • author's avatar

  • author's avatar

    What you don’t know may (pleasantly) surprise you
    CNIL’s Google Fine of 50 million Euros
    In praise of a privacy compliance program
    Looking to 2019 Privacy Plans
    Preparing your customer-facing staff

    See all this author’s posts

Privacy Ref provides consulting and assessment services to build and improve organizational privacy programs. For more information call Privacy Ref at (888) 470-1528 or email us at info@privacyref.com

Posted on May 12, 2013 by Bob Siegel
Tags: , , , , ,

« »

No Responses

Comments are closed.


« »

Subscribe to our mailing list

Please fill out the form below.

Required

Want to find out more?

Simply go to the contact page, fill out the form, and someone from Privacy Ref will be in touch with you. You can also send an email to info@privacyref.com or call (888) 470-1528.

News

April 5, 2019

See you at the Summit
Visit us at Booth 500 at the IAPP Global Privacy Summit. Bob Siegel will be facilitating the CIPM course. April 30th-May 1st, 9 am - 5 pm. Meeting time available to discuss your privacy needs is available for signup here.

Latest Blog Posts

May 17, 2019

1 Minute Quick Privacy Ref-ernces

If you have a moment take a look at our 1 minute videos to get caught up on the latest things going on in the privacy community. California Consumer Protection Act - Ben Siegel discusses the California Consumer Protection Act and how some of the advancing Amendments can drastically change the CCPA.

Continue reading this post...

May 16, 2019

Fallout from a Fallout

It is often that a data breach reveals other issues that a business is experiencing, but it isn’t every day I see the opposite. When I heard about what was happening at Bethesda Softworks and their online game, I was interested immediately.

The background on this is simple enough. Bethesda is a well-known video game maker with a number of well-known titles. Fallout 76 was the newest title in one of their series, but unlike previous titles, was an online game. Many were excited for this title and there special editions of this game offered to those willing to spend extra. Upon the launch of a game with a large amount of bugs and glitches, a number of issues took place.

Continue reading this post...

Other Recent Posts

PRIVACY REF